Articles

The purpose of this article is to identify the constitutional meaning of the rules establishing responsibility in the sphere of citizenship of the Russian Federation. In constitutional law, there are sanctions such as cancellation of the decision on granting citizenship, termination of citizenship, deprivation of citizenship. The Constitution of the Russian Federation prohibits deprivation of citizenship. Nevertheless, the current legal regulation allows for the application of constitutional sanctions that interrupt the political and legal connection with the Russian Federation. The Federal Law of 2023 “On Citizenship of the Russian Federation” provides for the institution of termination of citizenship, which involves the loss of a person’s legal connection with the state both voluntarily (renouncing citizenship of the Russian Federation of his own free will) and involuntarily — regardless of the person’s wishes. It seems that forcible termination of citizenship should be considered as one of the measures of the constitutional responsibility of an individual. The basis for this liability is the commission of a constitutional offense incompatible with the high status of a Russian citizen. The law provides for two groups of grounds for compulsory termination of citizenship: ex ante grounds — which occurred before the decision on admission to citizenship was made; ex post grounds — which occurred after the decision to grant citizenship was made.

The principle of the welfare state presupposes the active participation of the executive branch in the fair distribution of resources, significantly changing the balance of power in the traditional system of separation of powers, creating an imbalance not in favor of the legislative branch and weakening the latter. In the field of social policy, Parliament is losing its role as one of the leading links in the system of separation of powers, ceding the role of de facto legislator to the government and turning into an administrative machine for plebiscite approval of government initiatives. The Government uses the institutions of legislative power both for the actual regulation of social policy, including the establishment of standards of social life, income, and social support measures, and to expand its own powers, turning into a de facto legislator in this area. The latter thesis is confirmed by the quantitative and qualitative indicators given in the article, for example, a high level of support for government social initiatives. The latter are adopted practically unchanged, and the control of the legislator is of a legal and technical nature. The result of lawmaking is not the law as a rule of conduct and the will of the legislature, but the law as an act of the government, that is, the law only in the formal sense. The removal of the legislator from an active role in social policy suggests a violation of the principle of separation of powers. One of the ways to restore balance is to transfer direct management of the social sphere to autonomous decentralized agencies while maintaining effective parliamentary control over them, including the legislative procedure for the establishment of such departments, their accountability to parliament, as well as the participation of parliament in the appointment of their senior management.

The concept of legal regulation of labor relations, in which a foreign organization acts on the employer’s side, has been awaiting its formation for a long time. The economic and legal conditions of economic life and business activity in Russia, as well as abroad, have long since changed dramatically. At the same time, national standards do not take into account the specifics of work in organizations with a cross-border nature of activity, and international standards are not distinguished by certainty. Such an economic and legal phenomenon as a transnational corporation has a certain impact on the vision of the situation and legal decisions. Traditional ideas about transnational corporations blur the difference between employers with a complex structure (employers with separate structural divisions) and integration groups of employers so far generally ignored by the legislator, limiting the circle of foreign employers only to those that have a commercial nature of activity. This approach is not acceptable for relations in the sphere of labor, the legal regulation of which must take into account the diversity of methods and forms of organizing the activities of economic entities, including activities of a cross-border nature. To avoid difficulties with legal qualifications, the concept of “transnational corporation” should be perceived in the scope and with the content that corresponds to the term denoting it.

In Part 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the liver of the results of intellectual activity that cannot be objects of patent rights is fixed (the list of non-patent objects). Some bioethical principles have been fixed in this legal norm, which is certainly necessary in the context of the rapid development of biotechnologies. But from the point of view of law enforcement, this norm seems to be incomplete and requires specification. Moreover, as indicated in the article, these provisions of Russian civil legislation are not a very successful compilation of the provisions of the European declaration. 

The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of international agreements and norms of foreign law, according to the results of which the author made proposals for a significant change in the legal structure of Part 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and its addition with relevant principles of bioethics, which it seems necessary to take into account in patent law in correspondence with the norms of special legislation. In addition, to increase the effectiveness and optimality of law enforcement practice, based on the results of a comparative analysis of concretized examples of patent prohibitions with the provisions of special laws in the field of health protection, legal algorithms for the application of these prohibitions, arising from their legal nature, were identified.

The article presents the text of one of the few surviving monuments of Roman law — the Tabula Baetica, containing an agreement of fiducia with a creditor. The author has translated this document and conducted a detailed analysis of its content. Special attention is given to the analysis of the institution of mancipatio and to the controversial issues in civil law, such as the status of the Tabula Baetica: whether this document was a real contract or a model of security, as well as the question of the completeness or fragmentary nature of this legal monument. The study includes toponymic and archaeological analysis, discusses the features of individual provisions of the Tabula Baetica, including possible engraving errors in the document, and assesses its significance for modern legal science. The work considers various viewpoints of researchers, identifies and explains key legal aspects, emphasizing the importance of the Tabula Baetica for understanding the development of Roman law and its influence on modern legal systems. The author analyzes individual fragments of the text, relying on classical jurists and contemporary research, which allows for a deeper understanding of the context and application of this legal instrument.

The author comments on the ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in case No. A45–19074/2021. There is a view that this ruling classified damages recovered in criminal proceedings in connection with a criminal offense as punitive damages. The author refutes this view, since it is unreasonable to believe that the Supreme Court had the goal of completely reformatting Chapter 59 of the Civil Code in the ruling of the Economic Chamber, and proves that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation had the goal only of prohibiting the commercial court from resolving the issue of returning the amount paid under the sentence of the general court jurisdiction, that is, it resolved the issue of the competence of the courts. From this ruling, it is impossible to draw any far-reaching conclusions on substantive law. The position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the issue of the competence of courts in the assignment of rights has been criticized, since it is based on an unreasonably broad interpretation of Art. 383 Civil Code. In this interpretation, one can only support the Court’s decision to determine courts’ jurisdiction over a substantive relationship based on the moment of its emergence and not on any further developments (such as claim’s assignment, succession, etc.).

theoretical and practical legal study of the problems of legal regulation and the practical implementation of the right of complaints of citizens and organizations against decisions, actions (inactions) of public authorities authorized to provide state and municipal services was carried out. The importance and place of the legal institution of state and municipal services in the system of Russian law is considered. The features of the right of complaint in the process of obtaining state and municipal services as a guarantee of legality in public administration are studied. The historical and legislative conditions for the introduction of the sub-institution of pre-trial appeal into the structure of the institute of state and municipal services are determined. The following problems of legal regulation of the procedure for filing and considering complaints from recipients of state and municipal services have been identified:(1) the need to form a conceptual apparatus for pre-trial appeal; (2) building its model within the framework of the more general administrative-legal institution of the right of complaint; (3) features of the protection and restoration of the rights and legitimate interests of recipients of state and municipal services; (4) the ratio of general and special norms in this area. 

Based on the results of a study of theoretical and legislative foundations, as well as materials from judicial practice on the consideration of public law disputes in the field of state and municipal services, proposals were made to improve the legal institution of the right of administrative complaint.

The article is dedicated to the memory of Alla Viktorovna Pashkovskaya, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University. The author tells about the life and creative path of her Teacher and demonstrates her view on solving a number of controversial issues of criminal law, some of which did not have time to find their reflection in her scientific publications.

The article is a continuation of a number of scientific studies on the criminalization of financing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, as a legal and financial response of countries to the recommendations of the intergovernmental commission on financial monitoring — Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering or as is customary in our Russian-speaking environment — The Group for the Development of Financial Measures to Combat Money Laundering, which was the developer of International Standards on countering the Legalization of Criminal Proceeds and the Financing of terrorism, the Proliferation of Weapons of mass Destruction, the recommendations fall into the interdisciplinary field of international public, civil, contract law and the sciences of criminal law and criminalistics cycles. At the same time, they have international regulations and, accordingly, implementations into the national legislation of the participating countries of the anti-washing system. 

The regional group presented by the type of Group for the Development of Financial Measures to Combat Money Laundering includes some countries of the former Soviet Union — Russia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, as well as foreign countries India and China. 

The process of criminalizing the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is currently being updated as a novelty in the field of anti-money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and involves the development of a certain set of legal measures and tools.

One of the main categories of forensic expertise is object. Our article conceptualizes this category concerning the forensic authorship examination of text borrowings. We model a system of speech objects that arise when text is illegally borrowed (plagiarism, copy-paste) and should be investigated during the forensic examination of speech. From the standpoint of criminalistic identification theory, we describe the process and mechanism of borrowing (copy-paste) in various situations: rewriting or retyping someone else’s text manually, scanning a document or part of it from paper, borrowing in digital space using the copy + paste method. For the last method, the most commonly used, we consider in detail the “roles” of objects in borrowing and their significance for the identification procedure. The article demonstrates that the totality of compositions and texts is interconnected due to the reflection of textual material. According to general rules of criminalistic identification, objects are divided into verifiable and searched, identifying and identifiable. The presenting model of the objects system for the first time provides a criminalistically adequate understanding of the essence of borrowing. That is the basis for a future forensic methodology that will reliably establish the presence or absence of text borrowing.