Welfare state and parliamentarism: harmonious neighborhood or regime of incompatibility?

Abstract

The principle of the welfare state presupposes the active participation of the executive branch in the fair distribution of resources, significantly changing the balance of power in the traditional system of separation of powers, creating an imbalance not in favor of the legislative branch and weakening the latter. In the field of social policy, Parliament is losing its role as one of the leading links in the system of separation of powers, ceding the role of de facto legislator to the government and turning into an administrative machine for plebiscite approval of government initiatives. The Government uses the institutions of legislative power both for the actual regulation of social policy, including the establishment of standards of social life, income, and social support measures, and to expand its own powers, turning into a de facto legislator in this area. The latter thesis is confirmed by the quantitative and qualitative indicators given in the article, for example, a high level of support for government social initiatives. The latter are adopted practically unchanged, and the control of the legislator is of a legal and technical nature. The result of lawmaking is not the law as a rule of conduct and the will of the legislature, but the law as an act of the government, that is, the law only in the formal sense. The removal of the legislator from an active role in social policy suggests a violation of the principle of separation of powers. One of the ways to restore balance is to transfer direct management of the social sphere to autonomous decentralized agencies while maintaining effective parliamentary control over them, including the legislative procedure for the establishment of such departments, their accountability to parliament, as well as the participation of parliament in the appointment of their senior management.

References

1. Fosscule, A. (2004) Erosion of the parliamentary system in the Federal Republic of Germany. Moscow (in Russ.).
2. Hayek, F.A. von. (2006) Law, legislation and freedom: new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Moscow (in Russ.)
3. Huber, E.R. (1965). Rechtsstaat und Sozialstaat in der modernen Industriegesellschaft, in: Nationalstaat und Verfassungsstaat, Studien zur Geschichte der modernen Staatsidee, Stuttgart.
4. Pilipenko, A.N. (Ed.). (2018). Decentralized bodies and institutions in the system of executive power of foreign states: a scientific and practical guide. Moscow (in Russ.).
5. Koshel, A.S. (2020). Parliament and lawmaking: modern understanding of the role of parliamentary procedures and laws in a transformed society. Moscow (in Russ.).
6. Krasnov, M.A. (2012). Powers of the President of the Russian Federation delegated by legislation Constitutionalism. Moscow (in Russ.).
7. Krasnov, M.A. (2020). To fix the triangle: the imbalance of the power system is the main drama of our Constitution. Moscow (in Russ.).
8. Sajo, A. and Uitz, R. (2021). The Constitution of Freedom: an Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Moscow (in Russ.).
9. Soboleva, A.K. (2020). Social rights in the context of the new powers of the President. Moscow (in Russ.).
10. Stelnikova, N. A. (2016) Delegated legislation in modern law: concept, reasons for application and significance. Moscow (in Russ.).