Articles

The article reveals various aspects of the influence of the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 1993 on the development of national constitutional justice. Such development is ensured through the improvement of constitutional norms by the legislator and, in this regard, the significance of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ, the adoption of which led to a certain modification of the existing model of constitutional justice, is revealed. It is shown how the understanding of constitutional norms on the organization and activities of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has changed under the influence of amendments made to the Federal Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation” in 2009, 2010, 2014, 2016 and 2020. In addition, a significant role in the development of constitutional justice is played by the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation itself, which ensure the interpretation of constitutional norms in a certain socio-political context. Many of these positions were further constitutionally and legislatively fixed. The influence of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the development of constitutional justice is revealed from several thematic perspectives: ensuring the autonomy and independence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as a body of state power; its composition, powers; the legal force of its decisions; regional constitutional justice. In conclusion, the author’s view of the problems under consideration is offered.

The Constitution of Russia, despite pessimistic forecasts during its adoption, caused, among other things, by the idea of the targeted, anti-crisis nature of this document, was a reliable basis for the formation of national consent, reconciliation of society, and became the most important guarantee of the preservation of Russian socio-cultural identity based on traditional spiritual and moral values. In modern socio-historical and geopolitical conditions, the consolidating role of the Russian Constitution and its potential associated with ensuring the sovereign development of Russian statehood is increasing. Designed to ensure state development in conditions of historical turbulence, the Russian Constitution enshrined flexible, self-adjusting mechanisms for balancing the interests of the individual, society and the state, based both on respect for the heritage and traditions of our ancestors, and on the desire for social progress. It is necessary to consistently reveal the normative, value-semantic content of the current Constitution of Russia, for which an essential prerequisite should be its demythologization in the sense of abandoning its distorted interpretations inspired by the currents of liberal-individualistic globalism. Some judgments on this matter, concerning, in particular, the ideological side of state development, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the system of constitutional values, spiritual, moral and legal education in the education system, are set out in the article with the expectation of further scientific dialogue and the formation of a new constitutional paradigms of Russian statehood.

The results of a study of the human rights practice of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the context of external challenges and threats are presented, the role of the institute of human rights as one of the integral elements of national sovereignty is considered. An attempt has been made by scientists and practitioners to study issues related to finding a balance between generally accepted standards and national characteristics in the protection of human rights, choosing tools to ensure effective monitoring of human rights and freedoms at the supranational level, and forming effective mechanisms by international organizations for human rights violations using the most optimal and constructive means. 

Guided by one of the main principles of human rights activity — mercy and humanism — outside politics, it seems necessary to study and comprehend existing conceptual approaches in the legal doctrine in the field of human rights protection and methodological tools of foreign colleagues-ombudsmen in order to test best practices and improve the effectiveness of human rights assistance. 

Taking into account modern realities caused by the systemic crisis of the international system for the protection of human rights and freedoms, the main directions of human rights activities, the main international and foreign human rights platforms for the development of cooperation are identified, new formats and promising areas of international cooperation in the field of human rights aimed at strengthening national sovereignty, respect for the principles of equality, independence and justice are highlighted.

At the same time, attention is drawn to negative trends associated with derogation of attention to the national system of constitutional law, deformation with the inclusion of Russia in the Bologna process of domestic philosophical and ideological principles of legal education, and the transition to a two-level system of training legal personnel (bachelor’s — master’s degrees). In this regard, specific directions for improving the teaching of constitutional law are proposed, taking into account the national characteristics of the philosophical and ideological foundations of domestic legal education, and the feasibility of transition to a constitutional model of training legal personnel is substantiated.

The author’s approach to the theory and practice of constitutionalism in the system of Russian legal education is presented. The very concept of constitutionalism is considered in this case on the basis of the unity of scientific, doctrinal, legal implementation and educational, methodological principles. This presupposes the need to substantiate new approaches both to the structure and content of the educational course on constitutional law, and to the organizational, legal, and methodological issues of its teaching. In this regard, the main guideline of the domestic legal education system should not be a narrow sectoral one (criminal security, corporate civil law, etc.), but a constitutional model of fundamental training of legal personnel. This presupposes the recognition of the ideas of constitutionalism as the basic principle of the system of teaching legal disciplines, bearing in mind the unity of legal theory and legal practice, lawmaking and law enforcement, considered on the integrative basis of legal positivism and the sociology of law, sociocultural, axiological characteristics of the legal existence of the individual, society and state. 

At the same time, attention is drawn to negative trends associated with derogation of attention to the national system of constitutional law, deformation with the inclusion of Russia in the Bologna process of domestic philosophical and ideological principles of legal education, and the transition to a two-level system of training legal personnel (bachelor’s — master’s degrees). In this regard, specific directions for improving the teaching of constitutional law are proposed, taking into account the national characteristics of the philosophical and ideological foundations of domestic legal education, and the feasibility of transition to a constitutional model of training legal personnel is substantiated.

The article examines the monograph by A. V. Kopylov “Legates, fideicommissas and donations in case of death in Roman classical law” (M., Gorodets, 2021). It is noted that a monograph on the stated topic is a natural stage of the author’s research work. The monograph first of all determines the place of these institutions in Roman civil law. At the same time, the connection between these institutions of inheritance law and the institutions of property law and, in general, their role in the circulation of things is shown. One of the main tasks that were solved through the use of legates and fideicommissas was the transfer of rights to things in order to protect the interests of family members (heirs under a will). The author points out the genetic connection between institutions. A. V. Kopylov examined the historically first forms of institutions (mainly legates and fideicommissae), as well as their features that developed by the classical era, and, as necessary, comparisons with the subsequent era take place. In the final section of the study, the author contains a brief historical outline of the development of the institutions discussed in the book. The review notes that the appendix to the main text contains an extensive list of author’s translations of fragments of the Corpus iuris civilis, the sixth book of the Justinian Code and Novellas, previously unknown to Russian readers. The main conclusions of the review can be reduced to the fact that the monograph by A. V. Kopylov is of great scientific importance and is of interest both to novelists, philologists, historians, and to a wide range of students and graduate students.

The article is a biographical study devoted to the scientific and public activities of a famous Russian lawyer Alfons Ernestovich Vorms (1868–1939). The article based on the materials of family and state archives as well as on published sources. The author has a task to open thoroughly the most important and interesting sides of A. E. Vorms’ life and activities. The main moments of his life path are shown in the article: from a talented student to a professor, who has a great authority in the scientific world of Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union. The author gives a characteristic to the most significant Vorms’ works and finds the features of his scientific views. A. E. Vorms is an author of many works on civil, peasant, trade and bills law. He also was doing a great teaching and enlightening work, and he was a successful lawyer. At Soviet period, he also worked as a consultant for some Soviet and foreign companies and state bodies. At the end of his life, Vorms was repressed, spent several years in correctional labor camps of Siberia and finally died at Butyrka prison hospital. He was rehabilitated posthumously. The long-term and productive Vorms’ activities are the notable contribution to the history of Russian jurisprudence.

Essence and structural organization of oath in legal aspect was studied. Oath as personal solemn confirmation by religious and non-religious act is considered, which was used as an element of jurisprudence in the past and is currently relevant. The structural organization of the oath is presented by analogy with the construction adopted in the normative legal theory. Modern using of oath highlights the relevance of topic. It is noted that structure of oath has practically not undergone significant changes from ancient until now. Oath breaking as basis of punishment is considered. Psychic and emotional side of oath is considered. As an illustration of the semantic content of oaths, excerpts from literary works of ancient Greek authors are given. Taking the oath according the topic imply legal aspect of activity by persons and authority. Publicity of the sworn-in ceremony is indicated. An original version of structuring of the oath is proposed. The sources of the research are original written documents, as well as translations with comments, fragments that have come down to us or intact petroglyphs located in archaeological parks or museums. The deductive, inductive, historical-linguistic, formal-legal methods along with description, analysis and synthesis, and non-stationary research were used.

The paper considers the interpretation of the problem of sovereign power proposed by John Austin. According to the jurist, political power is a neutral force, similar to the objective forces of nature and abstracted from social relations. The abstract idea of power, being the “soul” of political communication, has a conditionally independent existence. Its effect on the actual relations is possible only insofar as it turns out to be “reified” and “personified”. The power remains in a “dormant” state in the institutions of the state and its head (sovereign), who is responsible for the reproduction of the political and legal plane, legal and social order. The article analyzes the essence of political power in the concept of J. Austin, a number of features that could characterize, in his opinion, any sovereign power, and especially emphasizes the most vulnerable place in his teaching — the feature of the “determinateness” of the sovereign. In conclusion, the author summarizes that, firstly, in the theory of J. Austin it is unclear who exactly acts as the “true” bearer of the properties of sovereignty, secondly, if it is impossible to determine the “party of sovereignty”, or it is extremely difficult to determine it, then the theory under consideration that is trying to operate empirical facts should be considered as inconsistent with reality.

The problem of the legal nature of international jurisdiction agreements is directly related to the issue of their regulation in the national legislation, since, depending on the material or procedural qualifications of this institution, particular regulatory requirements for such agreements are to be established. This article analyzes various approaches to the definition of the legal nature and, consequently, the regulation of international jurisdiction agreements on the example of English, German and Russian legislation. The material qualification chosen in English law means a more flexible regulation of the agreements: the possibility to conclude an oral jurisdiction agreement as well as the possibility for one party to use remedies (anti-suit injunctions, damages) in case of violation of the jurisdiction agreement by the other party. The procedural qualification of jurisdiction agreements in German law presupposes the establishment of stricter formal requirements (requirements for the subjects of agreements, form (written or oral with written confirmation), time of the conclusion of the jurisdiction agreement). In Russian law, this issue has not been finally resolved and is debatable, so that the legislative regulation of agreements on jurisdiction is generally fragmentary and is replaced by the construction and interpretation of norms in judicial practice.

The function of law, or the legal function, is currently a category that is significant for the general theory of law, and for individual legal sciences. The category “function of law” refers in its importance to such important categories as legal relationship, legal norm, legal personality. They appear to have obvious specifics, but their study goes beyond a separate type of legal science, requires mandatory comparative research at the level of the general theory of law. At the same time, this, in turn, does not mean exactly following the provisions of general theoretical science, since the law of social security has its own scientific doctrine. Theoretical research in the field of social security should enrich not only branch science, but also general legal scientific disciplines. In addition, it is important that the study of any one key category cannot be carried out in isolation from others. It is impossible to study a legal relationship without taking into account the norms of law, it is impossible to study legal facts without conducting research on legal relations and legal norms. Therefore, the study of issues of legal personality should be studied together with the provisions on the norms of law, legal relations and other basic categories of law. In this sense, the study of the functions of law will also be impossible without referring to the main categories that determine the uniqueness of the branch of law. 

At this stage, one of the problems associated with the functions of law is the problem of the relationship between the concept of “function” and “essence”. Whether a function is a property that expresses the essence of a legal phenomenon, whether a legal phenomenon can have other properties than the essential one, whether a function should take into account these properties or should be limited to one, these questions are in demand both in the theory of law and in branch sciences. Despite the sufficient elaboration of theoretical questions about legal functions, the problems of the multifunctionality of legal phenomena and the correlation of the functions of law and the functions of the state are still relevant.