The article reviews the new edition of the textbook “Prosecutor’s Supervision”, prepared by the leading researcher in this field of law, Professor V.B. Yastrebov, Doctor of Law, and Candidate of Law V.V. Yastrebov. The article provides a positive assessment of the authors’ approach to presenting the course, which is based on both a qualitative historical analysis of the Russian Prosecutor’s Office and modern approaches to the theory of prosecutor’s supervision as a field of scientific knowledge. At a high doctrinal level, the authors cover the legal basis of the organization of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, provide a definition and characteristics of its functions, and pay attention to the issues of further development of the Prosecutor’s Office, taking into account the concept proposed by them. Of particular interest is the actual rejection of the traditional approach to studying the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office through the lens of the branches of prosecutorial supervision. The authors offer a deep study of the concepts of “function” and “main area of activity” of the Prosecutor’s Office, which is of educational and scientific interest. It seems that the new edition of the textbook, which differs from previous editions in its more detailed and comprehensive coverage of the fundamentals of the organization and activities of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation, can provide a high-quality study of prosecutorial supervision as a multifaceted area of activity of this important state body, as well as the corresponding academic discipline, by students of the Law Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University and other law schools and faculties in our country.

This article is focused on the problem of technological and educational determinant in ensuring systematic legal regulation of informational (digital) technology use. The research is conducted through the prism of state legal regulation stage. In the framework of this work the approaches to technological development and its legal control are being analysed, special attention is paid to digital technological development. The social aspect of digital and technological development is characterised as a factor of its systemic legal regulation, considering the secondary nature of systemic law in regards to level approach to social systems. In this research the authors accentuate the role of educational determinant of implementation of informational technology's systemic legal regulation and functional purpose in training the professionals, who can organise and improve this legal regulation and work in the conditions of development of legal system in the context of informational (digital) technology integration. This article describes the logic of cognition of educational determinant of ensuring systemic legal control and the use of informational (digital) technologies, it also touches upon the state of professional educational institutions in particular the implementation of informational (digital) technologies legal supervision in the case of specific law universities.

The task of overcoming the imbalance that arose as a result of the violation by one participant of civil law relations of the subjective rights of another person is designed to solve the institute of compensation for damages, which has gone through many stages of development before its final formalization into the current legal structure, which in this article is proposed to analyze as the example of French legal doctrine. Civil law institutions do not always work like a shagreen skin and not all the participants in civil turnover can get the desired result when activating the procedure for compensation for damage caused by the actions of the violator, therefore, the discussion about choosing the optimal form of compensation for harm remains relevant today. This brief review, conducted through a comparison of the expediency of choosing between monetary compensation or fulfillment of an obligation to compensate for harm in kind, allows you to feel, very well not only the semantics of the institute of compensation for damages, but also to see the main trends in the development of the theory of civil liability in France. Due to the fact that the adoption by the legislator, judicial practice and later by the doctrine of the decision on the choice of performance in kind or pecuniary indemnity as a priority in compensation for harm is of a fluctuating nature and is associated with socio-economic circumstances in a specific historical period, and, therefore, cannot have the features of a long-term practice.

The problem of legal technique in Russian legislation on political parties is a current direction in the constitutional and legal doctrine. One of the means of legal technique in party law is presumptions. They are based on the legal recognition of a certain fact without the need to establish it by law enforcement instruments. The ambiguous understanding of presumptions at the theoretical level predetermined the complexity of their perception among legal scholars specializing in party legal relations. Thus, they are mixed with related legal structures (legal values, principles and guarantees). This problem is complicated by the uneven development of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, as well as the imbalance in judicial practice, in which it is necessary to interpret party-legal collisions on the basis of a certain legal regime. Therefore, presumptions in the institution of political parties are usually divided into universal (constitutional-legal and civil-legal), special (administrative-legal) and specific (party-legal) according to the criterion of the relationship of norms in the branches of law. The main methodological technique was structural analysis, because it ensured the identification of normative elements in the current party legislation. The systemic method helped to correlate party-legal norms with norms from related legal institutions, which used similar legal techniques. As a result of the analysis of party legislation, similarities and differences between party-legal presumptions and presumptive elements ensuring the procedure for implementing the law were revealed.