Articles

On April 16, 2024, the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University hosted an International Round Table “International Labour Law: Genesis, Problems and Prospects of Development (to the 120th Anniversary of the First Labour Agreement and the 105th Anniversary of the ILO)”. The participants of the round table — representatives of the bodies of the Eurasian Economic Union, officials of state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation, representatives of state authorities of foreign countries and representatives of leading educational and scientific centers devoted their speeches to the history, current problems and future development of international labour law. This review presents the abstracts of the participants’ reports on many theoretical and practical issues of international legal regulation of labour.

The article examines the formation and activities of scientific schools of Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov, the Law Faculty of Moscow State University on the example of the scientific school of the Department of Business Law. In a relatively short period of time, the department was able to create a team of like-minded people, the results of whose activities meet all the necessary requirements of a modern scientific school. The article examines the main areas of scientific research in the field of business law, the relationship of scientific research of the department with the areas of research in other branches of law: civil, civil procedure, labor (other private law disciplines), administrative, financial and other public law disciplines. Particular attention is paid to the mutual influence of economics and law, taking into account the subject of legal regulation. The scientific school of the Department of Business Law is closely connected with the educational process. The achievements and features of the educational process at the department are shown, the goals and objectives facing its staff in training modern lawyers with a fundamental education and a broad range of knowledge in the field of law are defined.

The article discusses incorrect theoretical positions about the essence of criminology as a scientific discipline engaged in direct forensic activities in the investigation of crimes and that this activity is carried out by an investigator. The functional and other features of the activities of a forensic investigator are outlined.

The article highlights the most important milestones in the life and creative path of the largest legal historian, Oleg Ivanovich Chistyakov, from the Great Patriotic War to the end of his life. His contribution to the development of historical and legal science is noted, as the initiator, editor of the entire publication, as well as the author of the 9‑volume “Russian Legislation of the X–XX centuries”, for the publication of which in 1996, already in modern Russia, he, as the head of work, together with some members of the author’s team, was awarded the State Prize for the first time among legal historians the prize of the Russian Federation and awarded the title of “Laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation”. 

O. I. Chistyakov was the first president of the Russian Historical and Legal Society, established in 2000. He is the developer of the problems of the form of state unity, the author of the allocation of the state with autonomous entities as a special form, attributing Russia not to the federation, but specifically to this form of the state. The issues raised by the author in his works are not outdated and are relevant. O. I. Chistyakov’s scientific works, as well as educational literature prepared by him or a team of authors under his editorship, are still being published and are in demand.

The article critically analyzes the current reform of public broadcasting (öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk) in Germany, which began in 2020 with the adoption of Interstate Media Treaty and reached its maximum intensity in 2024, when the Expert Council of the Broadcasting Commission of federal states proposed the first draft of changes providing for a systemic restructuring of the institute. Focusing on the proposals for the transformation of public broadcasting in 2024, they are being evaluated for compliance with the constitutional and legal guarantees of the German communication order, which the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany throughout the post-war period deduced from the communication rights enshrined in article 5 of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany. To achieve this, the project of the contemporary reform is compared with the current model of public broadcasting, formed by the positions of the court in constitutionalized ordinary legislation, and constitutional-legal consequences of its implementation are forecasted, incorporating socio-political context. Existing issues within German public broadcasting are not excluded from consideration. As a result of the analysis, it is stated that in the case of the implementation of this reform, the postwar communication order of Germany, established by the Western Allies and legalized in the constitution, constitutional justice positions and legislation, will undergo a serious transformation through the growth of three main trends: centralization of regulation and management of public broadcasting; depoliticization and de-parliamentarization of public broadcasting; the neutralization of constitutional and legal guarantees of the independence of public broadcasting, primarily related to financing and its internal organization. It is suggested that the proposed reform is potentially incompatible with the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.