ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
En Ru
ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
Participation of the Roman see and the Vatican City State in international treaties: practice issues

Participation of the Roman see and the Vatican City State in international treaties: practice issues

Abstract

There remains a doctrinal debate about the current position of the Papacy in international law. The key issue on which scholars have not reached consensus is whether the names 'the Roman See' ('the Apostolic See', 'the Holy See') and 'the Vatican City State' ('the Vatican City') denote two distinct subjects of international law under the ruling of Supreme Pontiff, or whether they are synonymous with the same separate political entity (or denote the relationship of part and whole with respect to such the entity). As the practice of the participation of the Roman See and the Vatican City in bilateral and multilateral international treaties demonstrates, each of these entities is recognised as a separate party to the agreement, it concludes. The Apostolic See and Vatican City are separate units with international obligations and responsibilities. Both entities may sometimes be parties to the same trilateral and multilateral agreements. Since Vatican City does not have a foreign policy department for 'organisational economy reasons', in most cases, international treaties are signed 'in its name and on its behalf' by representatives of the Secretariat of State of the Roman See. Thus, the 'dualistic' concept of the international legal personality of the Apostolic See and the Vatican City State most accurately defines the state of affairs in inter-State practice.

References

  1. Marzanov, A.Y. (2024). The System of Government of Vatican City and the Internal Structure of the Holy See in the Context of the Issue of the International Legal Capacity of the Papacy. Constitutional and Municipal Law, 8, pp. 59–66 (in Russ.).
  2. Arangio-Ruiz, G. (1996). On the Nature of the International Personality of the Holy See. Revue Belge de Droit International, 2, pp. 354–369.
  3. Cismas, I. (2014). Religious Actors and International Law. New York.
  4. Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. New York.
  5. Cumbo, H.F. (1948). The Holy See and International Law. The International Law Quarterly, 2(4), pp. 603–620.
  6. D'Onorio, J.-B. (1997). The Holy See in the International Community. General Review of Law, 4, pp. 495–521 (in Fr.).
  7. Germelmann, F. (2009). The Holy See and Vatican City State in the International Community: International Law Practice and Internal Relations. Archive of International Law, 47(2), pp. 147–186 (in Germ.).
  8. Kelsen, H. (1966). Principles of International Law. New York.
  9. Köck, H.F. (1975). The international legal status of the Holy See as illustrated by its relations with states and international organizations. Berlin (in Germ.).
  10. Santolaria, J.J.R. (1995). Subjects of International Law: The Case of the Catholic Church and the Vatican City State. Lima (in Sp.).
  11. Worster, W.T. (2021). The Human Rights Obligations of the Holy See under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 31(2), pp. 351–423.
PDF, ru

Received: 02/11/2025

Accepted: 04/30/2025

Accepted date: 08/01/2025

Keywords: Holy See, Vatican City State, Papal States, Roman Curia, international legal personality, international treaties.

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-66-3-15

To cite this article
Issue 3, 2025