Peshin Nikolay Leonidovich

The article reveals peculiarities of implementation by local self-government powers in the sphere of housing and communal services, taking into account the latest changes in the federal legislation. As it is known, on the one hand municipalities are forced to finance constantly worn-out communal infrastructure (which often reaches up to 20 % of the total local budget), while tariff regulation in this area does not belong to exclusive competence of the municipality. On the other hand, the sphere of housing and communal services is a type of so-called local monopoly, since residents of municipal territories can not choose a provider of services, and this, objectively, does not encourage municipalities to improve their quality. The article examines the foreign experience of organization of housing and communal services at the level of municipalities, suggests solutions that can be applied at the level of local government in the Russian Federation. The issues related to the organization of accomplishment of the territory of the municipality to fulfill the requirements established by the norms of the Town Planning Code of the Russian Federation are considered separately.

The article analyses the organizational and legal problems associated with the consideration of applications, complaints and appeals to the prosecutor’s office. Regulations and enforcement practices are being investigated. A relatively legal analysis of the Instruction on the procedure for considering appeals and accepting citizens to the bodies of the prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation, approved by Order No. 45 of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation of 30.01.2013, is given, practical problems are outlined and ways to solve them are proposed.

The article examines the features of municipal strategic planning. On the example of the municipal formation (urban district) — resort city of Sochi, Krasnodar Territory, the issues of developing a strategy for the socio-economic development of the Sochi agglomeration, as well as prospects for interaction of municipalities with the federal territories are investigated. On the one hand, the strategy of socio-economic development, as a system of long-term priorities is a necessary condition for planning and development of the territory. The municipal strategy includes a package of projects (national, federal, regional), budget programs, business plans but often does not consider public opinion. On the other hand, the absence of a strategic document does not affect the development of the territory, since large investors (private and public stakeholders) implement business projects without informing the municipality. There is no legal provision for stakeholders to inform about the implementation of their plans. As a result, approved municipal strategies often suffer because of lack of large-scale investment projects or after significant changes in projects. Taking the example of Sochi, the “eternal” factor of competitiveness of the resort “sea, sun, climate” will work spontaneously and haphazardly, despite the significant multiplier effect of the tourism industry on the economy of the territory. To develop an effective tool for the development of the territory, which should be simultaneously a social contract, at the initial stage of developing a resort strategy, the main task will be to assess the competitiveness of the resort city in the domestic and foreign markets, develop a system of indicators of the competitiveness of the resort and regional tourism product.