Articles

The theory of legitimate interests was created within the sociological school of law. Interests have been interpreted as an individual’s aspiration to meeting its own needs. The theory has been directed on researching individuals’ legitimate interests. The question of corporate interests has been not properly researched, the problem of a subject of a legitimate interest has been not the point of discussion in a legal theory. There is no unanimous point of view on corporate interests within a science of civil law. Two opposite points of view co-exists in the doctrine: interests of corporations are real (realistic theories); only interests of sharers are real (fiction theory). It is possible to recognize the existence of corporation’s legitimate interests with specific legal nature, derived from entrepreneurial activity of a corporation. Legitimate interests are used by courts in the resolution of tax disputes, for example, by applying the principle of ‘bona fide’ tax administration. By analysis, other legitimate interests of a legal entity are legitimate expectations and the ‘tax reconstruction’. The research on the topic of legitimate interests of corporations are perspective for the tax law.

Despite big number of Russian and foreign publications on the issues of responsibility in international air law and international law, in general, these issues continue to be important and require further research, especially, in view of present-day complexity of relations governed by international air law. Based on the analysis of the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 1944, as well as dispute-settlement practice and documents of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) it is concluded that self-contained regime of State responsibility fully excluding rules of general international law on international responsibility will hardly develop in international air law in the foreseeable future. However, within the framework of international air law fully fledged lex specialis on international responsibility, allowing application of general rules on international responsibility to the extent not covered by such lex specialis, can develop. Lack of these lex specialis on international responsibility in international air law, will lead to unlimited application of general rules on international responsibility, including, in particular, rules on compensation for damages, and such application will result in claiming damages caused, for instance, by aviation accident, from a State in addition to rather big compensations received by aviation accident victims through private liability mechanisms actively used in aviation. Moreover, in view of lack of lex specialis on State responsibility in international air law regional and private mechanisms of State responsibility and compensation for damages will be more frequently used.

The article considers the basic theoretical provisions on the importance of the comparative legal method in scientific researches and in the practice of national criminal law-making. The article proves the admissibility and expediency of using the comparative legal method in the scientific substantiation of ways to improve the linguistic form of the Russian criminal law. It is specified that the possibilities of the comparative legal method in this area are limited, as each national law is written in the original national language, which has features of the lexical composition and grammatical structure, therefore, it is not the national systems of lexical and grammatical means themselves that are important for improving the linguistic form of the Russian criminal law, but rather positive experience with regard to general approaches to their use in the formulation of the content of criminal law prescriptions. Based on the analysis of the Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic, a number of successful legislative decisions are identified in terms of giving precision and clarity to the language of criminal law, attention is focused on the pragmatic function of legislative definitions, revealing the meaning of terms used in criminal law and giving them strictly fixed normative content, which contributes to the formation of uniform law enforcement practice; and it is substantiated that the Kyrgyz experience in this area deserves the close attention of the Russian legislator.

The article examines the legal significance of environmental information in a digital society and examines its characteristics such as reliability. It is this quality of information about the state of the environment that is enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. It is noted that reliable information about the state of the environment is information that is at the same time genuine (objective, undistorted, accurate), and sufficient (not excessive, but not fragmentary and not selective), and relevant (timely), unbiasedly collected and analyzed by a competent subject. The definition of the term “information on the state of the environment (environmental information)” included in the Federal Law “On Environmental Protection” in 2021 is also analyzed. It is concluded that the legal definition of the term in question does not allow distinguishing environmental information from all other information. The right to environmental information is analyzed in relation to the modern system of information support for state environmental management. The necessity of establishing a regime of transparency of information on the state of the environment is substantiated. It is proposed to develop and implement an information mechanism in the field of environmental protection — a system of information measures of influence (interrelated legal means that mediate the processes of collection, accumulation, analysis, storage, provision and use of reliable environmental information) on people’s behavior in order to ensure environmental protection, rational use of natural resources, environmental safety of humans and other objects.

Using the example of individual decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the peculiarities of the execution of Court decisions in the field of local self-government are shown. Special attention is paid to those who monitor law enforcement practices and supervise the implementation of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, examples are given that information on the execution of individual decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation appears in the annual Reports on the state of local self-government prepared by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation. Despite the fact that cases related to local self-government are not in the priority of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, it is during the consideration of this category of cases and the subsequent execution of decisions that new legal structures are formed, which have received some coverage in this article. Thus, Resolution No. 30-P of December 1, 2015, issued on the basis of an analysis of the legislation of a particular subject of the Russian Federation, was extrapolated to all subjects of the Russian Federation; a different arsenal of means was used to bring the legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation in line with the positions formulated by the Court; the results of monitoring the execution of the Court decision were public. The operative part of the Court’s decisions began to formulate obligations addressed not only to the legislator, but also to local governments (to regulate relevant public relations), as well as to courts and supervisory authorities, what to pay attention to when considering a specific category of cases (Resolution No. 27-P of May 30, 2023). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation began to independently adjust the mechanism of execution of its own decisions.

This article is devoted to the problems of interpretation and understanding of the concept of insolvency (bankruptcy) in the sources of law that regulated the bankrupt institution at various state-legal stages of the history of Russia. In order to study the described problems, the author explores both the sources of law of different periods of history, and various works of honored lawyers and jurists. The author also touches upon the doctrinal approach to the problems of the concept of “bankruptcy”, in connection with which special attention is paid to the fundamental works of pre-revolutionary thinkers such as G. F. Shershenevich, I. A. Pokrovsky and N. E. Tornau. In the article, on the basis of comparative legal analysis, the genesis of the concept of bankruptcy is revealed. The understanding of the essence of bankruptcy is revealed depending on the period of development of Russian law. The patterns and features of succession between the “bankrupt” legislation of Russia of different periods are analyzed. The approaches of various legal scholars to the understanding of the term “bankruptcy” in legal documents of various epochs of the state-legal development of Russia are described. The article draws a conclusion about the significant influence of the problem of “concepts in a bankrupt institution” on the development of all theoretical and historical knowledge in the field of insolvency (bankruptcy). This conclusion is revealed by the example of the historical and continuity connection between the normative acts of the historical periods of the state-legal development of Russia, which are far from each other.

The article aims at the assessment of legal regulation of pledge in the Boards of Social Welfare of the Russian Empire in the first half of the 19th century. The boards established by Catherine II worked as provincial banks accredited to meet the needs of the inhabitants of the governorates. The study focuses on the activity of the boards, which reflects the details of the economic development of the governorates, including those in the territories of Georgia and Azerbaijan integrated into the Empire in the first third of the 19th century. The author draws on extensive legal material and archival documents illustrating the reasons for the adoption of exemptions from general pledge regulations in relation to some of the boards. The specifics of the economic development of the territories, in a number of cases, empowered the legislator to expand the list of legalized pledge for certain governorates. The main subjects among the borrowers in the boards were nobles and merchants. Insufficient landownership of the nobility in a number of governorates led to the guarantee as one of the possible conditions for obtaining a loan in the boards. Due to the identified corrupt practices of the officials for obtaining loans in the boards, state workers were identified as special subjects of law, in respect of which special legal provisions were introduced in the boards.

Based on various sources, the author of this article explores the process of the emergence of the institution of indeterminate sentences in Soviet legislation. Its American and European roots are revealed, reflected in the legislation of individual countries, discussions on the issue of indeterminate sentences at international conferences and congresses. Also considered is the scientific position of pre-revolutionary Russian scientists in relation to indeterminate sentences. Some of pre-revolutionary scientists were in the public service, first during the Provisional Government, and then in the early Soviet period. In this regard, the author explores the specifics of the personnel of the Central Punitive Department of the People’s Commissariat of Justice in the initial period of its activity. It has been established that a number of prominent pre-revolutionary criminologists could influence the content of Soviet legislation in terms of introducing elements of indeterminate sentences. In this regard, the first normative acts of the Soviet state of the criminal law and correctional labor industries (1918–1921) are analyzed. The author comes to the conclusion that during the period of the formation of the Soviet state in Russia, important prerequisites were formed for fixing the institution of indeterminate sentences in the legislation. The article may be of interest both for historians of law and for specialists in the field of criminal and penitentiary law.

The review gives the main theses on the history of political and legal doctrines. It is mainly noted that this discipline is one of the oldest in classical legal education. Against the backdrop of widespread cuts in hours for fundamental legal disciplines, it is necessary to firmly defend our positions in the educational process of the theory of state and law and the history of political and legal doctrines.

The article is dedicated to the memory of an outstanding employee of higher education — Doctor of Laws, Professor Oleg Igorevich Krassov, who made an invaluable contribution to the development and upholding of the independent nature of the branch of land law and legislation. O. I. Krassov substantiated the independence of land law especially through the analysis and development of the concepts of “legal regime” of lands, land plots and other objects, as well as through the concept of “land plot”. Referring to the works of O. I. Krassov, in the current article his point of view is provided on the content of these concepts, determined by the norms of land, water, forestry, urban planning, natural resources (ecological), mining, and civil legislation. Oleg Igorevich is the founder of the studies of comparative land law. He has prepared monographs on land rights in Europe, common law countries, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Taking this into account, and as an additional substantiation to his opinion on the independent nature of the branch of land law and legislation, O. I. Krassov referred to world’s experience in the development of land law and rights to land and land plots in different countries. As a result, he advocated a unified legal regime for land plots. In his opinion, the legal regime of land plots is established not so much and not only by the norms of civil law and legislation, but by special rules established in land law, the Land Code, and land legislation.