International legal qualification of the conflict in Donbass from March 2014 to February 21, 2022

Abstract

This article is devoted to the legal analysis of the qualification of the armed conflict in the Donbass in the period from March 2014 to February 21, 2022, which is decisive for establishing the legal consequences entitled by this particular form of armed conflict. In order to establish the most objective legal assessment of this conflict, the positions of representatives of the Western and Ukrainian doctrines of international law are considered, as well as an analysis of historical facts and documents of international organizations. A study of Ukrainian and Western scientific sources showed the similarity of the positions of their authors in attempts to qualify armed conflict that took place in Donbass in the appointed time period, as international or as internationalized. At the same time, references either to propaganda editions, or to advertising and unproven events serve as an argument for such statements. At the same time, an analysis of the objective circumstances and the most authoritative documents of international organizations only casts doubt on the consistency of the material that those authors describe, but also casts to make completely different conclusions. Considering the approval of the Set of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements by the UN Security Council, and also drawing the attention to the facts, it becomes obvious the non-international nature of the conflict in Donbass.

References

1. David, E. (2011). Principles of the law of armed conflicts. Moscow (in Russ.).
2. Kremnev, P.P. (2019). Armed conflict in the South-East of Ukraine: legal qualifications and consequences. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Legal sciences, Vol. 23, 3, pp. 394–412 (in Russ.).
3. Gnatovsky, M.M. (2014). Interaction between international humanitarian law and international human rights law during the Anti-Terrorist Operation in similar regions of Ukraine. In O., Zadorozhniy. Ukrainian revolution of humility, Russian aggression and international law (pp. 779–801). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
4. Merezhko, O.O. (2014). International legal responsibility of Russia for the terrorist war against Ukraine at the Skhod. In O., Zadorozhniy. Ukrainian revolution of humility, Russian aggression and international law (pp. 891–895). Kyiv (in Ukr.).
5. Novashok, D.O. (2019). The violent conflict at the Assembly of Ukraine: aspects of international humanitarian law. Lviv (in Ukr.).
6. Repetsky, V.M. (2015). Establishment of international humanitarian law in the violent conflict in Ukraine. Newsletter of the Lviv Trade and Economic University. Legal sciences, 2, pp. 368–373 (in Ukr.).
7. Rusinova, V.N. (2016). “Jurisdiction” and “imputation” in ECtHR decisions related to the application of the Convention on the territory of unrecognized states: shaken, but not mixed? International justice, 1(17), pp. 59–69 (in Russ.).
8. Balzer, H. (2015). The Ukraine Invasion and Public Opinion. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16, pp. 79–93.
9. Grzebyk, Р. (2014). Classification of the Conflict between Ukraine and Russia in International Law (Ius ad Bellum and Ius in Bello). Polish Yearbook of International Law, 34, pp. 39–60.
10. Heinsch, R.W. (2015). Conflict Classification in Ukraine: The Return of the «Proxy War»? International Law Studies, 91, pp. 324–360.
11. Szpak, А. (2017). Legal classification of the armed conflict in Ukraine in light of international humanitarian law. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 3, pp. 261–280.