Alexander A. Linets

Globalization as an integrated system aimed at the rapid and barrier-free movement of large volumes of goods, services, capital and information between countries leads to the fact that the competitiveness of national goods and services acquires an international dimension. This often leads to a “race to the bottom” in labor law regulation, which reflects the perception of the relationship of labor legislation and unit labor costs in the price of national goods and services. International economic integration exacerbates this problem by linking trade and labor standards. Consideration of the economic basis of labor law (within the framework of “labor law and economics” as a field of knowledge) allows us to look at the standards in the field of labor through the prism of ensuring the growth of the welfare of society.

The functioning of the spot labor market is based on technologies that contribute to its international character. Thanks to digital platforms, employers can find performers of personal labor in various States that are most favorable to their ways of organizing business and managing labor in terms of minimizing costs, especially when it comes to performing remote work. The complexity of the situation is that there are significant uncertainties regarding the qualifications of the emerging relationship with gig employees. Judicial practice on this issue is being developed in various States, which, however, cannot be characterized by uniformity and certainty at the moment. In this regard, taking into account foreign experience, the article identifies a number of problematic issues of transnational performance of personal labor (determining the level of rights and guarantees provided to a person performing personal labor; possible attribution of this person to the “third” category of persons in some legal systems; possible formation of a plurality of persons on the employer’s side, etc.) and a comprehensive analysis of the relevant legal regulation (including in the field of remote labor regulation) is carried out. A number of definitions describing changes in the modern labor market are given, including: gig-employment; spot labor market; digital platform; participants in the spot labor market (consumer and performer of personal labor); crowdwork; on demand work, etc.

The qualification of relations as labor relations is a reflection of the legal nature of the interaction of a certain kind in the performance of personal labor and is an important tool for protecting the rights and guarantees of employees. People employed in the gig economy often need such protection, given the similarity of their situation to that of traditional workers. In this regard, individuals who perform personal work within the framework of digital platforms make attempts to qualify (re-qualify) the relations that arise with them into labor relations. To some extent, the attempt to “fit” the relations under consideration into the framework of existing legal structures is a kind of compensation for the lack of an adequate legislative response to the ongoing socio-economic changes. The article distinguishes between the organization of labor management based on the civil nature of interaction on the performance of personal labor, which ensures the implementation of the interests of the subjects of such performance, and an illegal attempt to reduce labor costs and maximize profits by depriving employees of their rights and guarantees. The article considers various state measures aimed at eliminating fictitious self- employment, which reflects the negative aspect of new forms of labor management organization. The conclusion is formulated that in most legal systems, one of the main criteria for distinguishing between labor and civil law relations is the degree of control that the platform exercises over the gig employee, and the level of independence of the person performing personal work corresponding to this control. These features are closely intertwined with the study of the “entrepreneurial” nature of the activity of the performer of personal labor, including through the prism of the formation of economic dependence on the employer.