A hundred cats still have not become a tiger: on the issue of administrative prejudice in the modern criminal law of Russia

Abstract

The article covers the issue of the criteria that the legislator can use when choosing acts punishable in the administrative-legal order for the construction of criminal-legal norms with administrative prejudice. It is shown that the line between administrative offenses and criminal acts is blurred (including due to the expanding use of administrative prejudice by the legislator). Historical examples of the construction of compositions with prejudice in domestic legislation are given, possible reasons for the absence of such norms in the first years of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 1996. Decisions of the Constitutional Court dated 10.02.2017 No. 2-P and dated 08.04.2021 No. 11-P are analyzed from the point of view of such criteria. Conclusions are formulated and substantiated about the relevance and effectiveness of “objective” public danger as a basis for criminalization, as well as about the incorrectness and danger of some doctrinal and law enforcement proposals to evaluate the dangerous inclinations of a person as a basis for criminalizing acts using administrative prejudice. It seems that the use of “subjective” social danger in the construction of elements of crimes is contrary to the principles of legality, guilt and justice. Its use brings the legislative trend towards the expansion of administrative prejudice closer to the provisions of the theory of the dangerous state of the individual, which is based on completely different principles.

References

1. Avakyan, S.A. (2022). Representation in constitutional law: issues of theory and practice. Moscow (in Russ.).

2. Bogdanov, A.V. (2021). Administrative prejudice in the criminal law of Russia.Moscow (in Russ.).

3. Golovko, L.V. (2013). Borders of criminal law: from formal to functional approach. Forensic Library, 2, pp. 77–90 (in Russ.).

4. Esakov, G.A. (2013). From administrative offenses to criminal offenses, or about the existence of criminal law in the “broad” sense. Forensic Library, 1, pp.37–45 Moscow (in Russ.).

5. Ivanov, N.G. (2021). Prejudice in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the Light of the Positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (on the Example of Article 116.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Criminal Justice, 3, pp. 34–39 Moscow (in Russ.).

6. Kuznetsova, N.F. (1967). Crime, corpus delicti, disposition of the criminal law norm (in order of discussion). Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 4, pp.35–48 (in Russ.).

7. Kuznetsova, N.F. (1993). Codification of norms on economic crimes. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 4, pp. 12–21 (in Russ.).

8. Kuznetsova, N.F. (2003). Seven years of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 1, pp. 6–18 (in Russ.).

9. Kuznetsova, N.F. (2009). Ways of humanization of the criminal legislation of Russia. Legislation, 7, pp. 51–59 (in Russ.).

10. Kuznetsova, N.F. (2010). The significance of the public danger of acts for their criminalization and decriminalization. State and Law, 6, pp. 67–75 (in Russ.).

11. Malkov, V.P. (2008). Administrative and disciplinary prejudice as a means of decriminalization and criminalization in criminal law. Gaps in Russian legislation,2, pp. 195–198 (in Russ.).

12. Miroshnichenko, D.V. (2022). Prejudice in Russian criminal law: theoretical and applied research. Moscow (in Russ.).

13. Pikurov, N.I. (1998). Criminal law in the system of intersectoral relations.Volgograd (in Russ.).

14. Prince, A. (1912). Protection of society and the transformation of criminal law.Moscow (in Russ.).

15. Kovalev, M.I. (Ed.) (1982). Problems of improving legislation to strengthen the rule of law and strengthen the fight against offenses: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Sverdlovsk (in Russ.).

16. Prozumentov, L.M. (2014). Grounds for criminalization (decriminalization) of acts. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Series: Law, 4(14), pp. 81–91 (in Russ.).

17. Pudovochkin, Yu.E. (2022). Problems of qualification of crimes with administrative prejudice (judicial practice). Moscow (in Russ.).

18. Khilyuta, V.V. (2021). Administrative prejudice in the context of understanding the essence of the crime. Actual problems of state and law, Vol. 5, 17, pp.117–136 (in Russ.).

19. Tsepelev, K.V. and Meduntsova, S.M. (2021). Problems of qualifying crimes with administrative prejudice: a scientific and practical guide. Moscow (in Russ.).