ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
En Ru
ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
Qualification errors in criminal cases considered in a special procedure for adjudication

Qualification errors in criminal cases considered in a special procedure for adjudication

Abstract

The article examines the problem of errors made by the investigative and judicial authorities in the qualification of crimes considered in a special procedure for making a court decision (Chapter 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). The author takes as a basis the definition of the qualification of crimes and qualification errors by the professor of Moscow University N.F.Kuznetsova. The contribution of N.F.Kuznetsova in the development of the problem of qualifying errors, which consists, in particular, in considering the corpus delicti as the main tool for qualifying a crime, in classifying the types of qualifying errors, in the proposed methodology for determining the number of these errors. In the main part of the article, using the materials of judicial practice, individual law enforcement errors made in the qualification of crimes considered in a special order are analyzed. The author of the article comes to the conclusion that the largest number of overturned sentences is associated with the wrong choice of the criminal law norm or its incorrect interpretation. Particular attention is paid to the problem of qualifying crimes, the composition of which includes the so-called evaluative features, the content of which is not disclosed in the criminal law and is established by the law enforcement officer depending on the actual circumstances of a particular criminal case. The author of the article believes that in such cases, priority should be given to the general procedure for considering a criminal case. Conducting a full-fledged judicial investigation, although it does not guarantee the correct final qualification of the crime committed and will not completely eliminate qualification errors, however, it can minimize them to a large extent.

References

Gertsenzon, A.A. (1947). Crime qualification. Moscow (in Russ.).

Golovko, L.V. (2016). Influence of the professional status of the court on the degree of its activity in criminal proceedings. Law, 1, pp. 27–38 (in Russ.).

Golovko, L.V. (2014). On the problems of the Russian criminal process. Bulletin of the Faculty of Law of the Southern Federal University, 1, pp. 75–80 (in Russ.).

Krylova, N.E. (2012). Controversial issues of the doctrine of the composition of the crime. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 4, pp.38–43 (in Russ.).

Kudryavtsev, V.N. (1972). Theoretical bases of qualification of crimes. Moscow (in Russ.).

Kuznetsova, N.F. (2007). Problems of qualification of crimes: Lectures on the special course “Fundamentals of qualification of crimes”. Moscow (in Russ.).

Propastin, S.V. (2020). Cancellation of acquittals by jury: is the lawyer guilty? Law practice, 2, pp. 16–20 (in Russ.).


PDF, ru

Received: 12/19/2022

Accepted: 10/26/2022

Accepted date: 12/26/2022

Keywords: criminal law, criminal procedural law, corpus delicti, qualification of crimes, qualifying errors, special procedure for making a court decision, reasonableness of a sentence

To cite this article
Issue 6, 2022