The problem of responsible government in Russia in the period between the February and October revolutions of 1917 (article two)

Abstract

This article continues the article devoted to the problem of the political responsibility of Russian Provisional Government. The author shows that violent overthrow of monarchial order didn`t bring to embodiment of ideas of liberal groups about establishment of political responsibility of the government before parliament. The Russian Provisional Government considered that it can bear responsibility for its decisions only before the people and therefore refused to consider itself responsible before the State Duma. Attempts of the Mensheviks and Socialists Revolutionaries to compel it to bear responsibility before Pre-parliament were also unsuccessful. Right up to its overthrow the Russian Provisional Government successfully counteracted the attempts of right-wing and left-wing political groups to establish the political control of any representative body over it. However, although the Russian Provisional Government remained irresponsible, it`s members bore responsibility before the political parties, which delegated them in the Government. Contrary to expectations of the liberal groups, period between the February and the October revolutions was the time of formation of a principle of party responsibility of the officials.

References

1. Avilov, B.V. (1917, September 15). Is a “pre-parliament” necessary? New life(in Russ.).

2. Bazarov, V.A. (1917, Jine 27). “Upper houses” of the revolution. New life(in Russ.).

3. Vishnyak, M.V. (1917, September 27). Responsibility of power. The cause of the people (in Russ.).

4. Editorial (1917, September 3). In the Executive Committee. Morning of Russia (in Russ.).

5. Editorial (1917, April 27). In the Provisional Committee of the State Duma. Speech (in Russ.).

6. Dodonov, B.F. (ed.) (2001). Journals of meetings of the Provisional Government. In 4 volumes, Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).

7. Dodonov, B.F. (ed.) (2019). Recordings of the proceedings of the meetings of the Legal Conference under the Provisional Government. March-October 1917. In 2 volumes, Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russ.).

8. Editorial (1917, October 4). «Kutsaya» constitution and revolutionary law. Business of the people (in Russ.).

9. Galili, Z., Nenarokov, A. and Heimson, L. (ed.) (1994). Mensheviks in 1917. In 3 volumes, Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).

10. Nenarokov, A.P. (1994). A missed opportunity to unite democratic forces in resolving the issue of power (documentary and historical essay). In: Galili, Z., Nenarokov, A. and Heimson, L. (ed.). Mensheviks in 1917. In 3 volumes, Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).

11. Editorial (1917, September 3). Organ of democratic control. Business of the people (in Russ.).

12. Shelokhaev, V.V. (ed.) (2000). Party of Socialist Revolutionaries. Documents and materials. In 3 volumes, Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).

13. Editorial (1917, September 2). Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies. Business of the people (in Russ.).

14. Editorail (1917, September 21). Draft Pre-Parliament. Morning of Russia(in Russ.).

15. Shelokhaev, V.V. (ed.) (1998). Protocols of the Central Committee of the Constitutional Democratic Party 1915–1920. In 6 volumes, Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).

16. Sukhanov, N.N. (1917, September 15). On the eve of the denouement. New life (in Russ.).

17. Serkov, P.P. (2018). Constitutional responsibility in the Russian Federation: modern theory and practice. Moscow (in Russ.).

18. Editorial (1917, September 23). Meeting on the reconstruction of power. Speech (in Russ.).

19. Editorial (1917, September 24). Meeting on the reconstruction of power. Speech (in Russ.).

20. Ustinov, V.M. (1917, September 23). Building power. Speech (in Russ.).