Activities of actors of genetic and legal education: theory and practice
Abstract
This research is the fourth in a series of articles devoted to the issues of genetic and legal education. In the first work, the author revealed the measure of freedom of the subject of law determining the mode of data use on the example of genetic information; in the second — the measure of freedom of the subject-addressee of genetic education in the context of its content; in the third — the features of the forms of genetic and legal education in the society of the Industry 4.0 era. The objective of the article is to analyze the work of genetic and legal education executors. The success and effectiveness genetic and legal education directly depends on its executors, who have to have the particular knowledge in respective field. And if this problem is being solved on school education level, then in regards to the remaining multimillion audience there’s still a lot of work that specialists have to do. As a result of this the objectives of this article are to study specific competences of genetic and legal education executors and study the form and means of this education. Authors focus on education factors which influence the competence model of subjects, performing genetic and legal education, composition. They also focus on the skill set and knowledge that the team of these educators should have, meaning special skills of genetic and law education executors are being analyzed. This article views the practical meaning of genetic and law education, its types and corresponding to it methods (official and unofficial education) are being analyzed. Authors conclude that it is necessary to conceptualize genetic legal education, and therefore provide relevant recommendations for science and practice pointing out the necessity to combine official and unofficial forms of education and work over the question of introduction of “genetic ombudsman”. In the course of this study, logical, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods were used.
References
- Voronin M. V. Mera svobody sub”ekta prava v opredelenii rezhima ispol’zo vaniya dannyh na primere geneticheskoj informacii // Zakonodatel’stvo. 2020. No 12.
- Levitan K. M. Yuridicheskaya pedagogika. М., 2017.
- A.A. Genodiagnostika: problemy pravovogo i eticheskogo obespecheniya // Eticheskaya ekspertiza biomedicinskih issledovanij: rukovodstvo dlya komitetov po etike / Pod red. A. L. Hohlova. M., 2021.
- Mohov A. A. Esli roditel’ ili inoj zakonnyj predstavitel’ pacienta otkazyvaetsya ot medicinskogo vmeshatel’stva // Sport: ekonomika, pravo, upravlenie. 2008. No 1.
Received: 11/26/2021
Accepted: 12/01/2021
Accepted date: 12/30/2021
Keywords: genetic education, executors, information, Industry 4.0, digital transformation, genomic technologies, freedom, interdisciplinarity, genetic ombudsman
Available in the on-line version with: 30.12.2021

