Constitutional nature of constitutional amendment rules

Abstract

Constitutional amendment rules fix the procedure of constitutional reform and also establish the formal and material limits of constitutional changes. These are one of the most important constitutional norms, because on their ground the rest of the constitutional norms are changed and even performed the adoption of a new constitution. Moreover, the validity of the constitution itself largely depends on constitutional amendment rules. Hart’s theory of primary and secondary norms helps to understand the constitutional nature of constitutional amendment rules, which perform the function of substantiating the validity of constitution changes. In this article, constitutional amendment rules are considered precisely as secondary constitutional norms. The article also substantiates the thesis that constitutional amendment rules should be changed only together with the adoption of a new constitution, since these are norms that determine the validity of other constitutional norms. When constitutional amendment rules are changed, arises a paradox of self-amendment (A. Ross), which leads to a formal logical error of self-reference. The paradox of self-amendment confirms that constitutional amendment rules must remain unchanged within the framework of the constitution. Constitutional amendment rules can only be changed by complete constitutional revision or constitutional revolution.