ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
En Ru
ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
Unlawfulness in criminal law provisions containing blanket clauses

Unlawfulness in criminal law provisions containing blanket clauses

Abstract

The article addresses the problem of unlawfulness in relation to crimes provided for in criminal law provisions containing so-called blanket elements, as well as in provisions establishing liability for violations of special rules. The paper analyzes the main approaches developed in criminal law theory to the unlawfulness of such provisions — “protective” and “regulatory” approaches. Particular attention is paid to the problem of applying provisions with a “blanket” disposition in cases where blanket legislation (that is, non-criminal legislation positively regulating social relations) is used to give an expansive interpretation to a criminal law provision. In some cases, these results in the application of a criminal law provision to relations that are closely related to, but nevertheless not covered by, the specific criminal law provision, thereby amounting to analogy, which is expressly prohibited by law. It is suggested that where such regulatory rules consist of safety requirements common to various types of economic or other activity, the application of safety standards from one sphere to another does not in itself constitute analogy in criminal law. The article confirms the conclusion that where the legislator has expressly limited, in a regulatory rule, the possibility of its application to other types of relations, the authority applying the law may not apply it to such relations in the course of the legal classification of an offence. However, where regulatory law contains different rules, some allowing their application to the relations under consideration and others excluding it, the authority applying the law is not obliged, when legally classifying an offence, to choose the norm that prohibits such application.

References

  1. Barshev, S.I. (1841). General principles of theory and legislation on crimes and punishments in two sections. Moscow (in Russ.).
  2. Gaukhman, L. and Zhuravlev, M. (2015). Law-making problems of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Criminal Law, 1, pp. 40–43 (in Russ.).
  3. Zazirnaya, M.M. and Bastrakov, A.V. (2025). On the possibility of qualifying acquisition of property intellectual rights as fraud. Criminal Law, 5, pp. 14–15 (in Russ.).
  4. Inogamova-Khegai, L.V. (2004). Qualification of crimes in case of competition between criminal law and other legal norms. In Y.V., Gracheva (Ed.). Criminal Law: Strategy of Development in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 128–133). Moscow (in Russ.).
  5. Kudryavtsev, V.N. (1960). Objective side of the crime. Moscow (in Russ.)
  6. Kurinov, B.A. (1984). Scientific foundations of crime qualification. Moscow (in Russ.).
  7. Mukhortova, M.V. (2023). Criminally punishable violation of special rules. Moscow (in Russ.).
  8. Pikurov, N.I. (2009). Qualification of crimes with blanket features of the corpus delicti. Moscow (in Russ.).
  9. Stepanov, P.P. and Gubko, V.A. (2022). On intellectual property as an object of fraud. Criminal Law, 1, pp. 58–64 (in Russ.).
  10. Stepanov, P.P. (2024). Criminal liability of tourism organizers for unsafe tourist services (Art. 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Issues of the objective side of the crime in law enforcement practice. Criminal Law, 10, pp. 51–71 (in Russ.).
  11. Ter-Akopov, A.A. (1995). Liability for violation of special rules of conduct. Moscow (in Russ.).
  12. Karapetov, A.G. (Ed.). (2018). Transactions, representation, limitation period: article-by-article commentary on Articles 153–208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow (in Russ.).
  13. Traynin, A.N. (1957). General theory of the composition of crime. Moscow (in Russ.).
  14. Pudovochkin, Y.E. (Ed.). (2018). Criminal liability for crimes related to violation of special rules. Moscow (in Russ.).
  15. Khilyuta, V.V. (2021). Dematerialization of the subject of theft and issues of qualification of encroachments on virtual property. Journal of Russian Law, 5, pp. 68–82 (in Russ.).
  16. Khromov, E.V. (2021). Issues of qualification of patient death. Criminal Law, 11, pp. 46–47 (in Russ.).
  17. Khromov, E.V. and Zyablikov, V.Y. (2024). Theft of incorporeal property. Criminal Law, 8, pp. 46–67 (in Russ.).
  18. Yani, P.S. (2021). Issues of qualification of illegal participation in entrepreneurial activity. Legality, 9, pp. 42–45 (in Russ.).
  19. Yani, P.S. (2023). Criminal violation of duty as a sign of a special subject. Legality, 8, pp. 35–40 (in Russ.).
  20. Yani, P.S. (2014). Unlawfulness as a sign of theft. Legality, 6, pp. 22–26 (in Russ.).
  21. Yani, P.S. (2016). Composition of violation of special safety rules: form of guilt. Legality, 6, pp. 39–43 (in Russ.).
  22. Yani, P.S. and Filatova, M.A. (2018). Fraud and transaction. Russian Justice, 3, pp. 11–15 (in Russ.).
PDF, ru

Received: 05/26/2025

Accepted: 05/27/2025

Accepted date: 10/01/2025

Keywords: criminal unlawfulness, analogy of law, interpretation of criminal law, blanket disposition, extended interpretation, subject matter of fraud, safety rules

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-66-5-10

To cite this article
Issue 5, 2025