ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
En Ru
ISSN 0201–7385
ISSN 0130–0113
Formation of the firm doctrine in Europe in the Middle Ages and Modern Times

Formation of the firm doctrine in Europe in the Middle Ages and Modern Times

Abstract

This article investigates the origins and identifies the prerequisites for the emergence of the institution of the firm. Then the process of formation of the doctrine of the firm in Europe in the periods of the Middle Ages and the New Age is analyzed. The sources used were domestic and foreign (mainly German) literature of the corresponding periods. When writing the work, author used historical-legal, comparative-legal and logical methods. With the help of these methods, it was revealed that the prerequisites for the emergence of the institution of the firm appeared in medieval Europe, also the relationship between the emergence of trade partnerships in medieval Europe and the need to distinguish the trade transactions of partners from the personal transactions of each of them was established. Author notice that already in the Middle Ages lawyers began to realize the distinction of means into those that distinguish the subjects of law and replace the signature and those that distinguish the objects of law and their properties. The problem posed by medieval jurists led to the necessity of solving the question of what exactly a firm distinguish, a merchant or a trade establishment? The solution of this question at the end of the XIX century led to the distinction between the concepts of firm and trade establishment.

References

  1. Elyashevich, V. (1910). Judicial person, his origin and functions in Eroman private law. Sanit-Petersburg (in Russ.).
  2. Makovskiy, A. (2010). About the codification of civil law (1922–2006). Moscow (in Russ.).
  3. Rozhkova, M. and Vorozhevich, A. (2014). Company name — a “stranger” among the objects of intellectual property. Industry and law, 10, 57–68 (in Russ.).
  4. Tomsinov, V. (2006). The state system of England on the eve of the revolution of 1640–1660, The second article. Lomonosov Law Journal, 5, 3–33 (in Russ.).
  5. Phippova, S. (2016). Firm law in Russia. Moscow (in Russ.).
  6. Chernykh, A. (1989). The treatise of Bartolo di Sassoferrato “On signs and coats of arms”. Middle Ages, 52, 307–322 (in Russ.).
  7. Bender, J.H. (1848). Handbook of Frankfurt Private Law. Frankfurt am Main (in Germ.).
  8. Endemann, W. (1865). German Commercial Law. Systematically Presented. München (in Germ.).
  9. Haab, R. (1888). Contribution to the History and Dogmatics of the Commercial Firm. Berlin (in Germ.).
  10. Homeyer, C.G. (1870). House and Court Marks. Munich (in Germ.).
  11. Köhler, H.W. (1953). “Business” and “Enterprise” from an Economic Constitutional Law Perspective. Lawyers‘ Journal, 23, pp. 713–718.
  12. Müssig, P. (2000). Commercial Private Law. Heidelberg (in Germ.).
  13. Schweitzer, K.W. (1803). Quaestionum Forensium de Firma Mercatorum Specimen. (in Lat.).
PDF, ru

Received: 11/10/2024

Accepted: 05/03/2025

Accepted date: 07/01/2025

Keywords: firm, company name, identification, means of identification, partnership, establishment, judicial person.

DOI Number: 10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-66-2-13

To cite this article
Issue 2, 2025