The institute of initiating cases of an administrative offense in the light of control (supervision) reform

Abstract

The modern concept of regulation of state control (supervision), municipal control assumes its coordination with the legislation on administrative responsibility to ensure the orderly application of state coercion. At the same time, the basic prerequisites for adjusting the grounds for bringing to administrative responsibility are currently set precisely by the legislation on control (supervision), which is focused on preventing and suppressing violations of mandatory requirements, and not on punishing them. The measures taken to achieve this goal indicate that at the regulatory level in Russia, a model of subordination of proceedings on administrative offences in relation to control and supervisory proceedings is being formed by limiting the grounds for initiating cases of administrative offenses, expressed in non-compliance with mandatory requirements. Within the framework of this model, the legislator introduces special restrictions to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation regarding the initiation of cases of administrative offences related to non-compliance with mandatory requirements, which are aimed at reducing the administrative burden on economic activity. However, in practice, the relevant legal regulations are applied restrictively and not to the full extent, which makes it difficult to implement the model of administrative-law measures enshrined in the legislation, by virtue of which bringing to administrative responsibility should follow the conduct of control (supervision), not ahead of them.

References

1. Arapov, N.A., Savinykh, V.A. (2022). On Guarantees of the Legitimate Interests of Private Persons under Polysemy of Law. Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, 5, pp. 150–192 (in Russ.).
2. Mitckevich, L.A., Vasilyeva A . F. (2017). State Control (supervision) in the Field of Business Activities and Administrative Responsibility: Criteria of Correlation. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 6, pp. 39–44. (in Russ.).
3. Nozdrachev, A.F. (2012). Control: Legal Innovations and Pending Problems, Journal of Russian Law, 6, pp. 18–27. (in Russ.).
4. Nozdrachev, A.F., Zyryanov, S.M., Kalmykova, A.V. — editorial board. (2022). Regulatory Policy of the Russian Federation: Legal Problems of Formation and Implementation: Monograph. Moscow. (in Russ.).
5. Plaksin, S.M., Abuzyarova, I.A. et. al. (2020). Control, Supervision and Licensing Activities in the Russian Federation. Analytical report — 2019. Moscow. (in Russ.).
6. Stakhov, A.I. (2016). On the Allocation of Control and Supervisory Administrative Proceedings in the Sphere of Activity of Executive Authorities. Issues of Economics and Law, 2, pp. 31–34. (in Russ.).
7. Vitruk, N.V. (2008). General Theory of Legal Responsibility. Moscow (in Russ.).
8. Yelfimova, E.V., Osintsev, D.V. (2015). On the control, supervision and administrative jurisdiction once again. Russian Juridical Journal, 4, pp. 99–107. (in Russ.).
9. Zyryanov, S.M. (2020). Problems of Construction of Administrative Offence Elements in the Articles of the Special Part of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences. Journal of Russian Law, 8, pp. 105–126. (in Russ.).